Hi Wally,
I discovered that KQCC plots near Yuma, AZ. It is really Asadabad, Afghanistan 34.51 lat 71.07 long (east), 844 meters.
I know this item isn't yours, but, I miss plotting MADIS obs.! Hope that will be possible with ease again!
Search found 38 matches
- Sat Sep 22, 2012 2:54 am
- Forum: Digital Atmosphere
- Topic: Updated station file for DAWS
- Replies: 142
- Views: 592452
- Fri Apr 06, 2012 7:57 pm
- Forum: Digital Atmosphere
- Topic: Updated station file for DAWS
- Replies: 142
- Views: 592452
Re: Updated station file for DAWS
Hi Wally, I do have version 2.07 For some reason, when I try to load your new csv, I now get error 32 from DAtmosphere. I can search the new table (looks like everthing is corrected), but it generates the error mesage where as my re-download of March 27's list still is accepted by DA. Thanks for all...
- Tue Mar 27, 2012 7:26 pm
- Forum: Digital Atmosphere
- Topic: Updated station file for DAWS
- Replies: 142
- Views: 592452
Re: Updated station file for DAWS
Hi Wally (again)...I think CZMY that you refer to is really CZMT(?), which you have corrected. CWHL plots in SE Manitoba...should plot in BC at 54.17N -130.35W (decimal degrees). Also, stations 62114, 62117 plot around 58N, -99.99W...they clearly don't belong there.
Heatwave
Heatwave
- Tue Mar 27, 2012 7:12 pm
- Forum: Digital Atmosphere
- Topic: Updated station file for DAWS
- Replies: 142
- Views: 592452
Re: Updated station file for DAWS
Wally...Thanks!
Is CZMT (which plots in Quebec) supposed to be elsewhere?
Heatwave
Is CZMT (which plots in Quebec) supposed to be elsewhere?
Heatwave
- Tue May 17, 2011 8:45 pm
- Forum: Digital Atmosphere
- Topic: New MADIS Links - Digital Atmosphere has OLD Links
- Replies: 9
- Views: 39854
Re: New MADIS Links - Digital Atmosphere has OLD Links
Hi folks...
The address for the huge MADAIS file hasn't worked for me since about May 12 or so. Does anybody have a similar experience?
Heatwave
The address for the huge MADAIS file hasn't worked for me since about May 12 or so. Does anybody have a similar experience?
Heatwave
- Wed Apr 06, 2011 2:42 am
- Forum: Digital Atmosphere
- Topic: Trying to eliminate bad station - a SHIP
- Replies: 3
- Views: 23419
Re: Trying to eliminate bad station - a SHIP
I've had the same problem as well. I also notice in addition that some ship observations are erroneously placed at -99.99 longitude, and also result in bullseye isolines. The only recourse is to manually delete the bad stations by use of the quality control function each time a map is plotted. Rathe...
- Mon Jan 10, 2011 8:43 pm
- Forum: Digital Atmosphere
- Topic: Digital Atmosphere Professional
- Replies: 2
- Views: 19974
Re: Digital Atmosphere Professional
I'm not sure what the full set of @@ stations would encompass, but I've come upon them in surface plots over the arctic ocean/ice.
Heatwave
Heatwave
- Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:12 pm
- Forum: Digital Atmosphere
- Topic: Updated station file for DAWS
- Replies: 142
- Views: 592452
- Thu Apr 01, 2010 9:14 pm
- Forum: Digital Atmosphere
- Topic: Bad station
- Replies: 1
- Views: 17707
Bad station
Station KRNM plots at 33d41m N 104d55m W elev 1118 M in New Mexico in Version 2.07.
In actuality, KRNM is Ramona, CA at 33d02m N 116d55m W elev 427 M
In actuality, KRNM is Ramona, CA at 33d02m N 116d55m W elev 427 M
- Thu Jan 28, 2010 8:46 pm
- Forum: Digital Atmosphere
- Topic: Updated station file for DAWS
- Replies: 142
- Views: 592452