Digital Atmosphere
Forecast Laboratory
Forecast Simulator
GNC Charts for Dig. Atm.


Historical data
Data By The Day
ARGON database system


Forecasters Reference Workbook
Weather Analysis & Forecasting
Weather Map Handbook
Severe Storm Forecasting
Weather Radar Handbook
Weather Forecasting Red Book
Storm Chasing Handbook
Weather Forecasting Handbook
Extreme American Weather


The Art of Storm Chasing


Ordering info
Station identifiers


Meteorology Lab (YouTube)
Training via Skype


Deutschland (Germany)

Weather Graphics is your source for weather forecasting tools, software, and books.


"Thank you for actually penning these books. They are a wonderful review of the concepts without the excessive (but necessary) amount of math behind them. I wish they had been recommended as supplements in both my undergrad and graduate years."

— Josh Tobias, 2017

� "I have used Digital Atmosphere for quite sometime and consider it to be one of the most straightforward, comprehensive, and operationally useful programs on my server. I have found it to be invaluable for my day-to-day analyses and forecasting as well as my ongoing research. Tim is also extremely helpful and absolutely indispensable when it comes to locating scripts, the best datasets, and even professional contacts to help make any organization as productive as possible."

Chris Robbins, iWeatherNet

"The quality of your products is second to none."

— C. Brian Batey

"Thanks Tim for your quick response (we like that at FedEx) about our Professional Versions! As we're a 24/7 operation, we're look forward to augmenting our present weather system with Digital Atmosphere."

— Mel Bradley, FedEx Operations

"Wow. Your books are incredibly technical and useful. I consider myself a very amateur weather watcher and feel that I am already ahead of the curve. Thank you."

— Terry W. Taylor

"The NEXRAD support is truly awesome and easy to use � and the �other� feature just really tops it off. This is about my sixth email tonight � the other five being to other spotters in the area telling them they just have to download Digital Atmosphere and give it a serious going over."

— David Cashion

"I'm really looking forward to the next phase of Digital Atmosphere Workstation. I'm sure it will be as excellent as all your other products."

— Simon Keeling
Weather Consultancy Services, UK

"I run and manage a number of festival type events and Digital Atmosphere is able to produce charts that I can use for normal weather forecasting with a fair degree of accuracy and in particular wind speed and direction that is crucial to many of events."

— Robert Connolly, GI7IVX

"The archive data arrived today. WOW! What an amazing set of data! Thanks again for all the extras that you included as well!"

— Bryan Bollman, IA

"We do run GEMPAK and all the Unidata software also, but your package has numerous advantages, the biggest being Windows."

— Anonymous

"I am very impressed with what you have done. I have already shown several people at work your site. I plan on talking to our MIC [Meteorologist In Charge] soon to see if we can get Digital Atmosphere in the office to complement/supplement AWIPS."

— Ken Simosko, NWS, Pocatello

"This new version is even better than the older version which was awesome! Your programming skills and met knowledge amaze me!"

— Chris Kincaid

Malaysia Airlines Flight 370

Investigation of a possible southern arc contrail

by Tim Vasquez / Weather Graphics
March 18, 2014

* Update / 2014-03-19: The metadata for the 0100 UTC satellite frame shows it was collected between 0030 and 0100 UTC. Since the radiometer operates in spin scan mode, it is likely the suspect contrail was sensed at approximately 0050 UTC, which given the timeline below would be consistent with a speed of M.86-.87. Coincidentally the B777-200's MMo is M.87, so if any of this is correct it would be the fastest speed at which overspeed warnings would not go off. I also added a VIS/IR comparison below.

Also see:
* Main Malaysia Flight 370 page
* Indian Ocean visible zooms

To date there has been a remarkable lack of data on the whereabouts of Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, which failed to arrive in Beijing after departing Kuala Lumpur on March 7-8. In an attempt to find contrails, on March 17, 2014 I posted numerous visible satellite sectors for the Indian Ocean, enhanced to compensate for the dim early morning conditions. It was thought that crowdsearching the images (as with Tomnod) would yield results, so I asked the PPRUNE community to examine them and provided some guidance as to what they should look like. Contrails are occasionally seen on high-resolution visible imagery (De Grand, et al, 2000; Carleton and Lamb, 1986, etc). They can be highly prominent in the early morning hours due to low sun elevations which create large shadows. One user on PPRUNE (Chicklets) found a signature that resembled a hairline contrail on the 0100 UTC image (7:00 am local time). After this was confirmed by other users (kayej1188, Turkey Brain, etc) I searched the image and located it (below; left is the feature without annotations, and right is with measurements).

Analysis of the METEOSAT7 imagery showed that this signature does bear a close resemblance to a typical early morning cloud shadow from a contrail onto the top of a stratified lower middle cloud layer, which given the appearance of double layers and a slightly cold signature on the IR channels appears to be a low overcast altostratus or altocumulus later at about 5 to 10 thousand feet beneath an mid-level inversion. This is in a region with virtually no air traffic, and no published air routes within several hundred miles. It is inconclusive whether this feature is in fact a contrail, due to the limited resolution of the imagery at this slant angle and the low albedo at this early hour. Alternative explanations include noise in the data and transverse cirrus bands. However due to the linear structure it was decided to investigate further. The archived METEOSAT7 imagery was loaded into the McIDAS (University of Wisconsin / SSEC) viewing software and the coordinates of the feature were measured as (-46.197,87.283 ... -46.495,87.548), measuring 39 km in length and oriented at an angle of 148.5 relative to true north.

The GFS 8/0000 UTC analysis for 250 mb showed flight level winds across this area of 230 true at 110 kt. Assuming this contrail is representative of an aircraft track of 149 true (magnetic 196) the aircraft would have had to assume a heading of 210 magnetic to fly a track of 196 magnetic, which would produce this contrail. Going from the hypothesis that the Boeing 777 autopilot was flown in heading mode of 210 with a normal heading reference without any change (possibly from pilot incapacitation or an intention to ditch the plane over open ocean), the flight track was backtracked in time. This backtrack fully compensates for magnetic declination and wind field changes, producing a curved and slightly uneven path. Surprisingly, this led back to the western Strait of Malacca region. The intent of a 210 heading is unknown and may fit into some of the suicide theories, as this initially points deep into the Indian Ocean and being highly oblique to the Indonesian island chain would be an optimal heading for "disappearing" the plane. The track shows a pronounced curve to the left near the end, owing to the effects of rapidly increasing magnetic declination (as much as 47W at the contrail point) and drift due to a jet stream at 45S.

In the table below we assume the aircraft flew westward and toward the Strait of Malacca as some of the Malaysian investigative reports indicate, and bypassed the 10N waypoint shown in the image above, and that after some sort of altercation or change in plans on board a heading of 210 was selected, which would be 210M, with heading reference in NORM as would be expected. This would then be engaged by putting the autopilot in heading mode in an attempt to fly out into the remote Indian Ocean. The first point in this set that would be crossed was at 500'N 9522'E. Here we assume FL390 with airspeed of M.82 (TAS=468 kt).

Position Wind (true) Reference
time from
10 N
Estimated time
N0500' E09522' 090/05 0:44 1830 UTC
N0000' E09227' 080/20 1:27 1913 UTC
S0500' E08942' 070/20 2:10 1956 UTC
S1000' E08711' 090/20 2:52 2038 UTC
S1500' E08505' 180/05 3:32 2118 UTC
S2000' E08336' 290/30 4:11 2157 UTC
S2500' E08244' 290/40 4:50 2236 UTC
S3000' E08226' 280/40 5:28 2314 UTC
S3500' E08242' 270/40 6:06 2352 UTC
S4000' E08337' 240/45 6:45 0031 UTC
S4500' E08611' 230/100 7:23 0109 UTC
S4611' E08720' 230/110 7:34 0120 UTC

This would place the aircraft at the contrail location close to the image time. There may be errors from wind estimates, airspeed, and satellite scan line time. The "x" plotted on the map below is the location of this suspected contrail, and it falls precisely within the search area map released in the past day.

Below is the suspected contrail location relative to the INMARSAT 3-F1 40-degree arc. It should be remembered that the arc is an approximation determined by investigators based on signal analysis, and depending on the exact time the signal was acquired the plane could be in a slightly different location along the track.

(Updated 3/19/2014) Below is a comparison of the visible and infrared channels. There is a vague region along and up to about 20 nm east of the suspected contrail that faintly suggests the line is actually the back edge of a cirrus fragment. This appears to be ruled out by the infrared channel, which does not show any cold anomaly in this area. The feature therefore is most likely either a contrail or a spurious artifact in the data.

Whether the plane could carry enough fuel to reach this far is a bit outside my area of expertise. This could depend considerably on what exactly was loaded at Kuala Lumpur and whether the plane was carrying extra fuel to minimize fuel purchase requirements at Beijing (so the cost of JET-A at Kuala Lumpur vs. Beijing may factor into this). One experienced A330 pilot I talked with over E-mail (Don Hudson) suggested 9 hours endurance, and if takeoff time was at 1641 UTC this would suggest fuel exhaustion around 0140 UTC, which does not conflict with the data.

So summarize, this is somewhat hypothetical because there is insufficient resolution and signal quality to determine for sure whether the feature in the image is in fact a contrail, and it could very well be spurious noise in the satellite signal. However if we assume that it is a valid contrail feature, there is a remarkable degree of correlation in all the data. Assuming it is valid, pinpointing the exact location of downing would also require correction of the shadow (~10000' AGL) to flight level (~40,000' AGL) with respect to sun elevation, placing it about 15-25 nm east of the shadow, and would require extrapolation along 210M (correcting for wind drift) to the presumed point of fuel exhaustion. Given the highly limited availability of remote sensing data in this area and lack of any other data, this signature deserves closer investigation.

Tim Vasquez is a meteorologist and owner of Weather Graphics in Norman, Oklahoma. He served as an aviation weather forecaster in the U.S. Air Force for 10 years before moving into meteorological programming and consulting. He has written 7 forecasting textbooks to date and is a columnist for Weatherwise and IFR magazines.

© 2014 Weather Graphics